Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Greer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 2008No. 40 EAP 2006PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Castille

The question on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in issuing Spencer1 instructions — that is, instructions to a deadlocked jury to continue to deliberate, with an open mind to reconsideration of views, without giving up firmly held convictions — in an instance where the jury foreperson volunteered to the trial court the fact of the deadlock as well as the numerical division among the jurors and the identity of the holdout jurors.2 A divided Superior Court panel held that the Spencer instructions were impermissibly coercive, primarily relying upon authority from the U.S.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Cecil RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. State v. KnightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Com. v. Baker, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Banks, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API