Legal Opinion

Stapp v. Mason

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case 101 — Action by Mbs. Nannie W. Stapp against T. P. Mason & C. P. Cody to Recover of Them Money Lost by Her Husband Belonging to Her, at a Gaming Place Set and Run by Them and Her Husband as Partners. — Per. 18. APPEAL FROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals.

Read the full summary

Case 101 — Action by Mbs. Nannie W. Stapp against T. P. Mason & C. P. Cody to Recover of Them Money Lost by Her Husband Belonging to Her, at a Gaming Place Set and Run by Them and Her Husband as Partners. — Per. 18. APPEAL FROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals. The errors committed to the appellant’s prejudice were: 1. The refusal of the court to strike from the answer the second paragraph, which charged that O. A. Stapp had an interest in the gambling house where the money was lost, and had an interest in other gambling houses, and lost money in other…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tiif court by

JUDGE HOBSON

— Affirming.

As shown by the evidence in the casa, and, in substance, found by the verdict of the jury, C. A. Stapp, the husband of appellant, Nannie W. Stapp, in connection with T. P. Mason and O. F. Cody, opened a gambling house in the city of Henderson, which they ran for some time.; getting a takeout on all the games played there. C. A. Stapp played in these games, and lost a considerable amount of money, which was the property of his wife, Nannie Stapp, and which he held as her agent. She thereupon filed this suit to recover of her husband’s partners…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  2. Elias v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peirano v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API