Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arrow Agency v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1960No. 9925Published

1Dissent

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:

I dissent.

I believe the complaint herein frames a cause of action on an express oral contract. Unless the evidence adduced at the trial tends to prove the issues thus raised, a nonsuit should be properly sustained. Evidence which tends only to prove an implied contract or quantum meruit will not be sufficient to withstand the motion.

In 17 C.J.S. Contracts § 569, p. 1203, it is said: * * generally, and at common law, in an action brought on an express or special contract plaintiff cannot recover on proof of an implied contract, or on quantum meruit, unless the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Livestock & Loan Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Johns v. Modern Home Crafters, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API