Legal Opinion

Nance v. Menefee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1925No. 15558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

Tbis suit was instituted in tbe district court of Garvin county by tbe defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to recover the sum of $237.50, alleged damages. Tbe defendants, Walter Nance and W. E. Keel, filed tbeir answers by way of general denial, and upon tbe trial of tbe ease to tbe court and jury, judgment was rendered in favor of tbe plaintiff for tbe amount sued for.

Tbe facts, as disclosed by tbe record, show that tbe defendant in error, Menefee, was engaged in the real estate business in Pauls Valley, and in 1922, Mary P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GuestNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Moody v. BurtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847
  3. Security State Bank of Enid v. RegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Durant v. StarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Nolan v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Sharp v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API