Edgerton & Augir v. Connelly
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum.— Error from Rush district court; V. H. Grinstead, judge. Application by Edgerton & Augir, as plaintiffs, for appointment of a receiver and for an order to sell the real estate of Edward Cohnelly, defendant. Application denied and motion overruled. Plaintiffs bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cole, J.:
On the 10th day of September, 1890, Edgerton & Augir obtained a judgment against Edward Connelly in the district court of Rush county, Kansas. On the 3d day of September, 1891, proceedings were *619commenced in said court to subject the equitable interest of said Connelly in and to a certain piece of real estate situated in said county to sale for the satisfaction of said judgment. To these proceeding Connelly interposed the defense that the land in question was his homestead, and therefore exempt under the constitution and laws of this state. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Edwards v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Ingels v. IngelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Tromsdahl v. NassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914