Duffy v. Foltz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This matter comes before this Court pursuant to a question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.1 The question this Court has agreed to answer is whether sanity is an element of the crimes of rape and kidnapping as defined by Michigan law. We hold that sanity is not an element of these crimes and that insanity is a burden-shifting affirmative defense, placing the burden of going forward with evidence of insanity on the defendant. The defendant having done so, the burden of going forward with evidence of defendant’s sanity beyond a reasonable doubt shifts to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. ChamblisMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. StephanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Paul D. Duffy, Jr. v. Dale E. FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ShahidehMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.