Frick v. Algeier
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Superior Court of Vanderburgh County.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, C.
This was an action, commenced before a justice of the peace, for money had and received by the appellant to the appellee’s use. The overruling of a motion made by the appellant for a new trial is assigned as error, the causes stated in the motion being that the verdict was contrary to law, and that it was not sustained by the evidence.
*256The contention here relates to the question whether the evidence established a defence of accord and satisfaction. We have carefully examined the evidence. In the transaction claimed by appellant as a compromise, his conduct was liable to the imputation…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Jones v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Maze v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1806
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coyle and Smith v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Shelby Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Goodwine v. AyresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Megrath v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1894