Legal Opinion

Frick v. Algeier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Superior Court of Vanderburgh County.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

This was an action, commenced before a justice of the peace, for money had and received by the appellant to the appellee’s use. The overruling of a motion made by the appellant for a new trial is assigned as error, the causes stated in the motion being that the verdict was contrary to law, and that it was not sustained by the evidence.

*256The contention here relates to the question whether the evidence established a defence of accord and satisfaction. We have carefully examined the evidence. In the transaction claimed by appellant as a compromise, his conduct was liable to the imputation…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Jones v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  3. Maze v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1806

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coyle and Smith v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Shelby Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Goodwine v. AyresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Megrath v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API