Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 10, 1984No. 84-1649Published

1DissentCoffey, Circuit Judge

The issue in this case is whether the Capital Improvement Board (“CIB”) and *959-the City Council of Baltimore (“Baltimore”) are adverse claimants to a particular stake held by the Indianapolis Colts. The majority asserts that the CIB and Baltimore “are not claimants to the same stake” and thus the Indianapolis Colts fail to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1335 (1982). In the alternative, the majority declares that even if a common stake does exist, the Colts are not presented with conflicting and vexatious claims to that stake. I dissent from the majority’s strained attempt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bierman v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. Major Oil Corporation, Andrew John Brennan, Special Master-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. The Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API