Legal Opinion

Seeber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 23, 2007No. 4D07-1624PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

956 So.2d 1240 (2007)

Thomas SEEBER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-1624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 23, 2007.

Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled "Motion to Modify Sentence." The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grosse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. WoodardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Matos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Reeves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API