Legal Opinion

Jarvie v. Arbuckle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, James N. Jarvie, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 7th day of July, 1913, dismissing the complaint upon the merits upon the decision of the court after a trial before the court, & jury-having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

From January 1, 1898, to June 1, 1906, plaintiff, John Arbuckle, William A. Jamison and William V. R Smith were copartners, carrying ón business in the State of New York and elsewhere. In the State of New York the business was conducted under the firm name of Arbuckle Brothers. On the latter date the firm was dissolved, plaintiff retiring therefrom on that date, and Smith a few days later. In anticipation of such dissolution and the continuance of the business by Arbuckle and Jamison, on April 4, 1906, plaintiff entered into *201an agreement in writing with them by which they obligated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Winchester v. GlazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Morss v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Conville v. ShookNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. State Bank v. NapierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  3. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  4. Furman v. TerbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Jarvie v. ArbuckleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API