Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Consumer Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1977No. 75-1221Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice White,

with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins, dissenting.

The Court today makes it possible for insurance companies doing almost no life insurance business to qualify for major tax advantages Congress meant to give only to companies doing mostly life insurance business. I cannot join in the creation of this truckhole in the law of insurance taxation.

I

Congress has chosen to give life insurance companies extremely favorable federal income tax treatment. The reason for this preferential tax treatment is the nature of life insurance risks. They are long-term risks that increase over the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. Economy Finance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API