People v. Clayton
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County for a further transcription and certification of the testimony taken at the trial. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Upon a suggestion of diminution of the record, the defendant has applied to this court for a further transcription and certification of the testimony taken at the trial. (Pen. Code, sec. 1247c.) The application is supported by the affidavit of the defendant.
The attorney-general opposes the application for reasons to be hereinafter stated.
The defendant was, on the twenty-first day of November, 1916, found guilty by a jury, in the superior court of Sacramento County, of the crime of grand larceny. On the twenty-fourth day of said month the court pronounced its judgment of sentence upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People ex rel. Smith v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Tuner & Dahnken v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Mankins v. Forward Movement SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SteffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. MahachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924