Legal Opinion

City of Markham v. State & Municipal Teamsters

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 25, 1998No. 1-96-4351PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

This case arises from an award in an interest arbitration proceeding that began when the parties disputed a provision in a collective bargaining agreement concerning the method of determining discipline of police officers. The arbitrator rejected plaintiff the City of Markham’s (the City’s) proposal, favoring that offered by defendant, the State and Municipal Teamsters, Local 726, which allows police officers to circumvent otherwise mandatory statutory procedures by submitting final disciplinary decisions of the City’s Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (BFPC) to arbitration as grievances.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 268Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Edwards v. City of QuincyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Marozas v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS, CITY OF BURBANKAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Burgess v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GordonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Ill. Nurses Assoc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Univ.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Illinois Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council v. Town of CiceroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Adams County Sheriff Robert Nall v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Nall v. INTERN. ASS'N OF MACH. & AERO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API