In re Stoneman
New York Surrogate's Court
In the matter of the final judicial settlement of the account of proceedings of William J. Stoneman and Alexander S. Rowland, as executors of the last will and testament of Matthew G. Stoneman, deceased. Will and partnership contract made by testator construed.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DERZEE, S.
In this proceeding on final accounting, there have been submitted for determination two questions of intent to be derived from the will and from a written contract made by' the testator in reference to certain assets due decedent from his daughter Carrie E. Breitenstein and her husband, George P. Breitenstein.
The facts are not in dispute, and are set forth in Schedule G of the account. Consideration will first be given to the partnership contracts, the facts concerning which may be summarily statéd. On July 17, 1893, the testator and his son William J. Stoneman were engaged in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Bank for Savings v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- People ex rel. Bank for Savings v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reed v. State Ex Rel. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Wilson v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Reed v. State Ex Rel. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997