Legal Opinion
Tate v. Progressive Security Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 2009No. 2008-CA-0950PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG.
11 The plaintiff-appellant, Printess Tate, Jr., (“Tate”) appeals a judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees, Durr Heavy Construction, LLC (“Durr”) and its insurer, the Gray Insurance Company (“Gray”), dismissing the plaintiffs suit against the defendants-appellees.
Tate suffered personal injuries on March 19, 2002, when he was rear-ended by a truck driven by Gilbert Brown. The parties stipulated: (1) that the sole and proximate cause of the accident was Mr. Brown’s negligence, and (2) that the plaintiff was entitled to $175,000.00, plus interests and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Amyx v. Henry & HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Hillman v. Comm-Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Tower Credit, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Arroyo v. East Jefferson General Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jeansonne v. SCHMOLKELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Steinfelds v. VillarubiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Iteld v. Four Corners Construction L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Chaisson v. Louisiana Rock Monsters, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.