Camfrancq v. Pilie
Supreme Court of Louisiana
THE plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the Court of Probates of St. Bernard, Rousseau, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Slidell, J.
In tMs case .the plaintiff, who is a free woman of color, claims *198of the succession of Hiligsberg, wages for services as a nurse, and the reimbursement of monies expended for the benefit of the deceased, in purchases for him, for household use. The claim is resisted on the plea that the services were gratuitous, that receipts, found among the papers of the deceased, show that he repaid her disbursements, and that a portion of the claim for wages is barred by the prescription of one year. Thei-e is also a general denial.
As regards the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Sugar Field Oil Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Bascle v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Doll v. Albert Weiblen Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Elam v. ShushanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Carroll Lumber & Supply Co. v. BushongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.