Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Sutton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 21, 1953No. 1718Published

1DissentQuinn, Chief Judge

I dissent.

I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that accused persons in the military service of the Nation are entitled to the rights and privileges secured to all under the Constitution of the United States, unless excluded directly or by necessary implication, by the provisions of the Constitution itself. Burns v. Lovett, 202 F2d 335 (CA DC Cir) (1952), affd sub nom Burns v. Wilson, 346 US 137 (1953). On that basis, I cannot agree with the majority opinion which lightly deprives the accused in this ease of a basic constitutional privilege.

The Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Ex Parte QuirinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API