Legal Opinion

McSwegan v. Pennsylvania Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1896Published

Motion by plaintiffs for a new trial on the minutes after dismissal of their complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

About June 7, Í893, the plaintiffs purchased' from Russell & Co., of Massillon, Ohio, one steam engine1 and fixtures, which were delivered to the defendant by Russell & Co.. for carriage and delivery to the plaintiffs, at Beverly, New Jersey. After the shipment ■ Russell & Co. sent the bill of lading to the-plaintiffs.

The goods were purchased by the plaintiffs to fill an order from the Beverly & Edgewater Park Light & Power Company (hereinafter referred to as the Power Company), a corporation having-its place of business at Beverly aforesaid. The plaintiffs did busi.ness at New York city, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrick v. BrainardNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  2. McEntee v. . the New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Keeler v. . SalisburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Green v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Codwise v. HackerNew York Supreme Court · 1804

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API