Legal Opinion

Cockerham v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1959No. 5-1784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Bose Smith, J.

This is a personal injury suit in which the appellee recovered $26,750 as compensatory damages for the loss of his left leg. The appellant contends that he was entitled to a directed verdict and, alternatively, that the court erred in refusing certain requested instructions.

Until the accident in question the plaintiff Barnes, a young man of twenty-three, had worked as a farm laborer on Coekerham’s farm ever since he was old enough to work. In July of 1955 Cockerham had his employees install a hydraulic irrigation system upon a forty-acre tract. The system consists of a main pipeline that lies…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ozan Lumber Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Willbanks v. LasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Ward Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. MouncenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sally A. Gisriel, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas Jerome Gisriel v. Quinn-Moore Oil Corporation, and Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Rhine v. HaleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Vanoven v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Hudgins v. MazeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API