Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1932No. Appeal, 265PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

Harold E. Williams has been twice convicted of murder in the first degree with the penalty set as death. The facts of the crime and the reasons for granting a new trial are set forth in Com. v. Williams, 307 Pa. 134, and Com. v. Prophet, 307 Pa. 122, and need not be again recited. The case comes before us now on defendant’s appeal from the second conviction and sentence, alleging many errors in the trial. We will discuss only a few of the assignments, particularly those relating to improper remarks of the assistant district attorney in the course of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ziang Sung Wan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. ColandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Holden v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LipscombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. McGroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. McGroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. CrittentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API