State v. Waterman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
No. 124,725 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. It is the task of the district court to ensure that a defendant's right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is honored. In order to fulfill this duty, when the district court becomes aware of a possible conflict of interest between an attorney and a defendant charged with a felony, the court has a duty to inquire further. If an appropriate inquiry is made, the district court's decision is reviewed under an abuse…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.