Legal Opinion

Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 2000No. 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

231 F.3d 82 (2nd Cir. 2000)

CONOPCO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ROLL INTERNATIONAL and PARAMOUNT FARMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 00-7012

August Term, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Argued: June 2, 2000

Decided: November 03, 2000

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.), dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

1

AFFIRMED. [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

2

ROBERT F. SERIO, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, New York, NY (Thomas C. Sheehan, of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API