Legal Opinion

Cotten, Ex Parte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1867Published

1Opinion of the Court

The facts were, that a notice had duly issued to the petitioner and the sureties upon his bond, returnable to Spring Term, 1861, informing them that a motion would be made at such term to have a judgment or order for the speedy collection of said bond. This notice was returned as having been executed. At Fall Term, 1861, an order was made, which, after reciting the judicial sale, the purchase, and the bond, and that ten days' notice of the present application had been given to the obligors — directed that the latter should pay the money into office on or before 1 April, 1862, otherwise, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lord v. . BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Hudson v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Lackey v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API