Legal Opinion
Pryce v. County of Suffolk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 28, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*895In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants County of Suffolk and Marcóse Flores appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), entered May 10, 2007, as, upon separate jury verdicts on the issues of liability and damages, and upon the denial of their motions pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law and pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of liability as against the weight of the evidence and for a new trial, is in favor of the plaintiff Clinton Pryce…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gross v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Frett v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barravecchio v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Conway v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Amin v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Deandino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Deandino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013