Legal Opinion

Enright v. Bringgold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1919No. 15064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered July 18, 1917, dismissing an action for slander, upon granting a non-suit.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action for slander. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the motion of the defendant Ada Stone Bringgold for a nonsuit was granted by the trial court; and afterwards, by direction of this court, State ex rel. Stone v. Superior Court, 97 Wash. 172, 166 Pac. 69, a judgment of dismissal as to her was entered. This appeal is prosecuted for the purpose of reviewing the action of the trial court in granting the motion for a nonsuit.

*234The fourth amended complaint, upon which the case went to trial, charges a conspiracy between the defendants to manufacture or procure testimony in a pending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Ransom v. McCurleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Massee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Fleet v. TichenorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cameron v. CameronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Bonkowski v. Arlan's Department StoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Blaser v. KrattigerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Paterson v. Little, Brown & Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  5. Romano v. United Buckingham Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API