Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rhodes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 99-1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Washington App. No. 98CA26. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed October 5,1999, at page 3:

“Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(A), this court determines that a conflict exists between the districts on these issues: (1) whether Ohio Revised Code Section 2305.15 as construed in Wetzel v. Weyant (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 135 [70 O.O.2d 227, 323 N.E.2d 711], is unconstitutional for the reason that it constitutes a burden on interstate commerce under the holding in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Wetzel v. WeyantOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Brown v. LaveryOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Safe Auto Insurance v. Linehan, Unpublished Decision (6-15-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API