Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Patel

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided September 21, 2005No. 08-04-00060-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Appellants Melton and Deborah Harrell appeal from a money judgment granted in favor of Appellee Natverlal “Natu” Patel. Appellants bring five issues on appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and raising issues dealing with the admission and exclusion of testimony. We must affirm.

After a bench trial, the trial court judge signed a judgment in favor of Appellee, awarding him an amount of $1,000,00o. 1 There were no findings of fact and conclusions of law filed. In the absence of findings of fact, we must imply all findings necessary to support…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bushell v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Devon Energy Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Robert Arispe v. Melissa Velazquez and Francisco Velazquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2023
  3. Rose M. Geister v. Discover Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Jose Barraza and Ruben Barraza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API