Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. Butterfield

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Normal, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwbll, Ch. J.

This is an action upon a contract as follows: “This agreement, made and entered into this 10th‘ day of De-’ cember, 1886, by and between E. A. Butterfield, of York county, Nebraska, and Jonathan C. Kingsley, C. J. Nobes, Cyrus Hutchins, George Hopkins, and C. M. Cowan, of York county, Nebraska, witnesseth :

“ That the said E. A. Butterfield, party of the first part, for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements of the said Jonathan C. Kingsley, C. J. Nobes, Cyrus Hutchins, George Hopkins, and C. M. Cowan, party of fhe second part, agrees to sell and convey to him, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vanderslice v. . NewtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Bristol Manufacturing Co. v. GridleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shutt v. LocknerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Barnhart v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Dill v. Farmers Co-operative Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API