Legal Opinion

In re Williams' Estate

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1894No. 18,247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Sacramento County; Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. Motions by respondents to dismiss appeals and strike matter from record.

1Per curiam

The respondents have moved to dismiss the appeals in this case upon the ground that the appellants are not persons aggrieved by the order and decree appealed from. The determination of this motion, involves an inquiry as to the merits of the case, and must, for that reason, be denied at this time.

Respondents have also moved to strike from the transcript and disregard a certain order and additional finding made July 29, 1893, on "the ground that the same is not part of the record. The motion is premature. The question attempted *512to be presented by the motion is one which, if necessary to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schlegel v. SissonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. O'Donnell v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Roy Tong v. Sun Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API