Legal Opinion

Doe v. Shady Grove Adventist Hospital

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 27, 1991No. 1058, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.

The issue as presented to us by the parties in this expedited appeal is whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County abused its discretion in lifting a seal of the records of this' case. The issue we decide, however, is whether appellant demonstrated a compelling interest in protecting the confidentiality of his identity which can be accommodated consistent with the presumption of open access to court records. We will hold that he has.

Appellant filed his complaint on July 11, 1991 under the fictitious name of John Doe, alleging breach of confidentiality of patient…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Doe v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICESCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Copeland v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. King v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Baltimore Sun v. ThanosCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. In the Matter of RodriguezCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API