Legal Opinion

Cacace v. Seniuk

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eli Wager, J.

The plaintiffs in this action for injunctive and declaratory relief contend that the defendants have violated their statutory and constitutional rights. The plaintiffs, corrections officers assigned to the Nassau County Correctional Facility, and the defendants, the Sheriff of Nassau County, the Commissioner of Corrections and the Acting Deputy Commissioner, *561the Warden and the Assistant Warden and the County Executive, have stipulated to the following facts.

At various specified times the defendant Sheriff or his employees compelled the plaintiffs to work…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pollock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruno v. Department of PoliceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API