Andersen, Meyer & Co. v. Fur & Wool Trading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Sepailoff was commandant of Urga under Baron Ungern, who, as an anti-Bolshevik leader, had entered Mongolia in aid of the Mongolian struggle for independence. Sepailoff seized Noskoff, the appellee’s agent, at his home after midnight, imprisoned him, pillaged his house, demanded a heavy ransom from his wife, and took possession of the appellee’s premises and seized the furs which are the subject of the present suit. Kotoff, the appellant’s agent, purchased the furs from Sepailoff and paid him $24,000 (gold), a sum which the evidence indicated was far below…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Young v. GodbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Towers v. TitusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Boxer v. Husky Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1981
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Water Com'rsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Magma Holdings, Inc. v. Au-YeungDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020