People v. Rivera
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Fisch, J.
Defendant, purporting to act pro se, while represented by *557counsel, moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that it is time barred under CPL 30.30. Upon receipt of the motion, the court conducted an inquiry to ascertain whether defendant’s attorney adopted said motion. Defendant’s attorney, after conferring with defendant, discussing the merits of the motion with him and conferring with her supervisor, has declined to adopt the motion. Accordingly, for the reason stated herein, the court refuses to entertain the motion and it is dismissed.
In People v…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 2007