Legal Opinion

No. 84-5623

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1985No. 602Published

1Opinion of the Court

772 F.2d 602

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

ONE 1980 MERCEDES BENZ 500 SE, Arizona Lic. No. AKL-249,

Vin: WB 1260 3612 001476, its tools and

appurtenances, Defendant/Appellant.

Dierk Hagemann, Claimant/Appellant.

No. 84-5623.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 3, 1984.

Decided Sept. 30, 1985.

Eric Nobles, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Carl Greifzu, Pasadena, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before WALLACE and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and MacBRIDE,*…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API