Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 2012No. S11A1663Published

1ConcurrenceNahmias, Justice

Two years ago, I noted that this Court had never explained the constitutional basis of the order announced in Division 2 of State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (322 SE2d 711) (1984), which directed, “[a]s a matter of policy” and without citation of any constitutional *573authority, that appeals of all murder cases, and not only those involving the death penalty, must come to this Court rather than going first to the Court of Appeals. See State v. Murray, 286 Ga. 258, 264 (687 SE2d 790) (2009) (Nahmias, J., dissenting). The silence was remarkable, because Thornton had led our Court over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Rhyne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API