Legal Opinion

Ross v. McLean

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 7, 1925No. 4196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

Samuel Ross sued Edward B. McLean in the lower court, alleging that he had sold and delivered to the latter a certain race horse, named the Porter, at an agreed price of $15,000 in cash, then paid, and a contingent one-third interest in all sums thereafter earned by the horse; that the horse afterwards earned various sums, the one-third of which amounted to $22,692.69; that the defendant had failed and refused to pay any part of this sum to plaintiff, although often requested so to do; wherefore he prayed judgment.

The defendant, upon the other hand, alleged that he had-…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Newcomb v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Lovejoy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Wertz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Walsh v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  4. (PC) Tran v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Adrian G Sassen Van Elsloo v. Whatcom County, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API