Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1942No. O-5003Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF - AUSTIN . a-Q.- -- Iionwublo R. I). Os%lt County Attorney W.lbarger Gouatg Vernon, n?xEl Rear Slrr Lois on the fm g this privl- PX of the.52 oun ee- a shorlff of xo:m county In or axtondad the prlvhlogc %lox tioa: ‘GlodLdIt be necessary that tho Conm~Qsioners Court pmt him a leave of abncncc, that lx the oomm3sionci?s oourt of his couoty? Ronorablc R. D. Cstglt, page 2 DO Caid COIZI!~LSX~D~~~O C&Pt htiv, tbE Wthority to want such Xesvc? And LP not, by what au-. thoritg would he be ent2tled to take this J.ca-+s upon? %u;d he be entitled ‘to his roguler salary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API