Legal Opinion

In re United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1978No. Misc. No. 7178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZIEGLER, District Judge.

I. History of Case

The instant matter involves the motion of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, pursuant to Rule 47 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to modify the order of this court dated September 5, 1978. The order authorized the installation of a pen register, i. e., touch tone decoder, and a terminating trap to a subject telephone within the jurisdiction of this court.

A pen. register is a mechanical device attached to a telephone line which records on paper tape, or by digital readout, all numbers dialed from that line. The device does not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Elrod v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  4. Matter of Babington v. Yellow Taxi Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. District Attorney for the Plymouth District v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. District Attorney for the Plymouth District v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API