Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1989No. 55128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and sentenced to thirty years. He had been charged with capital murder. That conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Sweeney, 728 S.W.2d 629 (Mo.App.1987).

Movant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in dismissing his 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing because he had “alleged sufficient facts which if true would have supported [his] claims of ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SweeneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas E. Alvey v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
  2. Gary v. Bullard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API