Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Franchise Tax Board

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided May 30, 2025No. 24-09005Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 POSTED ON WEBSITE 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION 4 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 In re ) Case No. 23-90021-E-7 9 ) MARTHA ISIDRO MENDOZA, ) 10 ) Debtor. ) 11 ) ) 12 MARTHA ISIDRO MENDOZA, ) Adv. Proc. No. 24-9005 ) Docket Control No. DPL-2 13 Plaintiff, ) ) 14 v. ) ) 15 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, a California ) political subdivision; DOES 1 through 20, ) 16 inclusive, ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ___________________________________) 18 This Memorandum Decision is not appropriate for publication. 19 It may be cited for persuasive value on the matters addressed. 20…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Clayton Baker Sally I. Baker, Debtors. Clayton Baker Sally I. Baker v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re: Roger E. Mantz and Sandra J. Mantz, Roger E. Mantz Sandra J. Mantz v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Dennis Berkovich v. California Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API