Legal Opinion

Midland Funding, LLC v. Pipkin

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 12, 2012No. 20110788-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

T1 Kenneth Pipkin, representing himself pro se, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Midland Funding, LLC (Midland). Pipkin argues that Midland's request for summary judgment should have been denied because Midland failed "to establish a prima facie case" or, alternatively, because there was a material dispute of fact as to the existence of the debt Midland alleged Pipkin owed. 1 We affirm.

12 "We review the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for correctness, granting no deference to the [district] court." Swan Creek…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. D. Lanty McCartney III v. First City Bank, Collecting Bank, National Association (A Bank in Liquidation) and First City Asset Servicing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mower v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API