Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Morrison

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1926No. 5730PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge :

Morrison and others, defendants below, here plaintiffs in error, and hereinafter called “Morrison” or “defendants”, prosecute error to the action of the circuit court in setting aside a verdict in their favor in an action of ejectment instituted by defendant in error, James M. Boggs, hereinafter called “Boggs” or “plaintiff”. The location of a division line is the basis of the controversy. The trial map will make the controversy clearer.

Morrison asserted that the true location of the division line is from a water birch on the bank of Elk River, thence in a straight course…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holly River Coal Co. v. HowellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Fleming Oil & Gas Co. v. So. Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wilson v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Miller v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Yonker v. GrimmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conner v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Burdette v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pocahontas Land Corp. v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Westland Realty Corp. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API