State v. Coulter
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The facts are stated in The State v. Coulter, ante, pp. 87, et seq., wherein the opinion was filed during the session of the court in October, 1888. The appellant filed a motion for a rehearing which the court overruled at its session in February, 1889, and then filed the opinion infra.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,:
It has often been decided by this court that only such alleged errors as are specifically pointed out by counsel, will be considered by this court. (Powers v. Kindt, 13 Kas. 74.)
Again, where counsel fail to specify any matter as error and this court perceives no error in the record, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed. (Thom v. Davis, 16 Kas. 22.)
Further, where it is alleged that the trial court erred in its rulings, it is the duty of the' party complaining to indicate wherein the error consists, as well as the particular ruling of which he complains. (The State v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powers v. KindtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- State v. JennersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Thom v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. KierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. Abilene Town-Site Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Bradford v. MaloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- State ex rel. Bradford v. MaloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889