State v. Morales
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBridgewater, J.
¶61 (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — Jose Matilde Morales appeals his vehicular assault and driving under the influence convictions. I would hold that Morales’s vehicular assault conviction, on the basis of either driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or driving in a reckless manner, cannot stand. Specifically, the State failed to prove that it advised Morales in Spanish of the special evidentiary warnings required by RCW 46.20.308(2); thus the trial court should not have admitted the results of his involuntary blood test. But I would affirm Morales’s vehicular assault…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RempelWashington Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.