Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Auto Finance, Inc. v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 2010No. A10A0836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

Following the grant of its application for interlocutory appeal, Wells Fargo Auto Finance, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration. Because Gary Lee Wright executed an arbitration agreement that mandated the arbitration of his claim, we reverse the trial court’s ruling.

The question of arbitrability, i.e., whether an agreement creates a duty for the parties to arbitrate the particular grievance, is undeniably an issue for judicial determination. The standard of review of a trial court’s ruling on a motion to compel arbitration is whether…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Triad Health Management of Georgia, III, LLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Order Homes, LLC v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Attaway v. Tom's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Autonation Financial Services Corp. v. ArainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Hornsby v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Suntrust Bank v. Jeff Bickerstaff, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Simmons Family Properties, LLLP v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Penso Holdings, Inc. v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Penso Holdings, Inc. D/B/A Capital Debt Settlement v. Melissa ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. TD Auto Finance LLC v. Freddie Reynolds and Shelby ReynoldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API