Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Semon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

“A. H. Kenyon and A. T. Morse, partners as Kenyon & Morse,” brought this action in the municipal court of Minneapolis against “J¿ S. Semon and W. H. Semon,” and had judgment by default, on October 28, 1889, for $175.18. Oh October 26th, William H. Semon, one of the defendants, appearing specially for the purpose of the motion only, served notice of a motion, to be made November 5th, to dismiss and strike out the complaint because it does not specify the Christian names of…

Read the full summary

“A. H. Kenyon and A. T. Morse, partners as Kenyon & Morse,” brought this action in the municipal court of Minneapolis against “J¿ S. Semon and W. H. Semon,” and had judgment by default, on October 28, 1889, for $175.18. Oh October 26th, William H. Semon, one of the defendants, appearing specially for the purpose of the motion only, served notice of a motion, to be made November 5th, to dismiss and strike out the complaint because it does not specify the Christian names of any of the parties except by the initial letters thereof. The motion was made on his own affidavit specifying the full…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.

Order and judgment affirmed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Honeycutt v. NyquistWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Davis v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API