Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Jones

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The argument was on motion to dissolve the injunction in this suit, made on bill and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The injunction was granted on application of the complainants, Johnston and the Perth Amboy and. Elizabethport Railroad Company, to restrain the defendants, Jones, Carpenter, Arnold, Bell, and Lindsley, who claimed to have been elected directors of the company, from interfering with the contract*218ors in constructing the road of the company, and from selling or pledging any stock of the company, and from exercising the rights and powers of directors.

The charter of the company, by the act approved March 30th, 1869, fixed the capital at $200,000, in shares of $100, with the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moffatt v. NiemitzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Mueller v. Kraeuter Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. "Regular Democratic Club" v. TracyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API