Legal Opinion
Discover Bank v. Bridges
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 2, 2010No. 39209-7-IIPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
¶1 John and Julie Bridges appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on their credit card debt to Discover Bank. They argue that the trial court erred in improperly admitting evidence and in finding that no genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
¶2 Discover Bank filed a complaint against the Bridgeses, seeking payment of a credit card debt. The Bridgeses, proceeding pro se, answered generally by denying the allegations.
¶3 Discover Bank moved for summary judgment on an $11,957.97 principal amount, plus interest at 28.99 percent per annum,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Express Centurion Bank v. StratmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Gardner v. First Heritage BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Unifund Ccr, Llc v. Amy ElyseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- American Express Centurion Bank v. Heinz HengstlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.