Matter of Petroleum Research Fund
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
The record before us presents a proper case for the exercise of discretionary power to grant intervention, as found in subdivision 2 of section 193-b of the Civil Practice Act. We construe this section as applying to both actions and proceedings.
To limit discretionary supervision to actions only, as contended by the appellant, is to utterly disregard the considerations which led to its enactment. A procedural device that is calculated to reform and modernize the remedy of intervention deserves a wide latitude of construction to effectuate its purposes.
This section was adopted in 1946 (L.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Richards v. RichardsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
- Industrial & Realty Financial Corp. v. Continental Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vantage Petroleum v. Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Veterans' Industries, Inc. v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Plantech Housing Inc. v. ConlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Albert v. SalzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.