Collier v. Zambito
New York Court of Appeals
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1DissentG.B. Smith, J.
Because a question of fact exists as to whether defendants knew or should have known of the potential of the dog to harm others, I dissent.
Plaintiff Andrea Collier commenced this action against defendants Charles Zambito and Mary Zambito seeking damages for injuries sustained by her 12-year-old son, Matthew, when defendants’ dog, a mixed beagle/collie/rottweiler, bit him in the face while he was a guest at their home.
At the examination before trial, Matthew testified that he had visited defendants’ home on five or six prior occasions as he was a friend of defendants’ son. During those visits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dickson v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Rider v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Perrotta v. PiccianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Wilson v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.